Fla. College’s Immunity Weighed In COVID Fees Refund Suit

By Nathan Hale

November 10, 2021

Miami Dade College urged a state appellate panel Wednesday to find that a lower court erred in advancing a proposed class action seeking prorated refunds for student fees after 2020 campus closures prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic, arguing that the pleadings do not satisfy requirements to overcome the school’s sovereign immunity.

Click here to read the original pdf.

Click here to read the original article.

Emotionally Draining: Meet the Miami Judge Rising to the Moment, Presiding Over Deadly Building Collapse

By Michael A. Mora

October 25, 2021

“The case, without a doubt, will be the most challenging of my career legally and emotionally,” said Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Michael Hanzman.

Click here to read the original article.

New Ruling Affects Prevailing Party Attorney Fees: ‘Florida Supreme Court Has Now Taken That Away’

By Michael A. Mora

October 11, 2021

Javier Lopez

Javier A. Lopez, Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton

A Florida Supreme Court opinion in a marital case is causing some lawyers to worry that the decision will spark a rise in frivolous litigation.

Click here to read the original article.

These South Florida Receivers Are Tired of Being the Only Women in the Room

By Raychel Lean

September 10, 2021

Miami litigators Corali Lopez-Castro and Melanie Damian are used to being the only women taking the lead role in a substantial state or federal receivership case.

Click here to read the original article.

Businessman Drops Appeal Of $32.5M Vt. Resort Investor Deal

By Nathan Hale
September 7, 2021

A Miami businessman accused of stealing $50 million from immigrant investors in Vermont’s Jay Peak ski resort is dropping his appeal of a recently approved settlement with law firm Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP that is expected to pay his alleged victims more than $30 million, according to his attorney.

U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles in Miami issued a paperless order Monday requiring alleged fraud mastermind Ariel Quiros to post a $250,000 bond if he wanted to appeal the district court’s approval of the settlement before the Eleventh Circuit, but Quiros’ attorney said Tuesday that her client had already submitted a joint motion with the law firm and one of its partners to dismiss his appeal.

In his order, granting a motion from a court-appointed receiver for several Jay Peak entities, Judge Gayles said Quiros had not responded to the receiver’s motion and that the amount the receiver requested was reasonable.

“We believe the judge reached the correct decision,” the receiver, Michael I. Goldberg of Akerman LLP, told Law360 on Tuesday. “We are hopeful that the appeal will soon be dismissed.”

Goldberg slammed Quiros in his Aug. 18 motion, calling Quiros’ objection “frivolous.” Goldberg argued the bond was appropriate to account for an estimated $203,200 in appellate costs and $46,800 interest to cover investors’ delayed receipt of settlement funds if Quiros pursued the matter before the Eleventh Circuit.

“By appealing the court’s final order overruling his objection to the settlement, Mr. Quiros — the mastermind of this fraud — continues his baseless attempts to interfere with a $32.5 million settlement that will put literally millions of dollars, and $20 million in very short order, in his victims’ pockets,” the receiver said.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission also expressed outrage over Quiros’ objections to the settlement, calling them “factually inaccurate, legally groundless and equitably repugnant” in a filing last month.

On Tuesday, Quiros’ counsel, Melissa D. Visconti, said they had not responded to Goldberg’s motion because they had filed a joint motion with MSK and partner David Gordon in the Eleventh Circuit to dismiss their appeal and had expected that order to have been entered by now.

“So, as soon as the Eleventh Circuit enters the order on that motion and dismisses the appeal, the [district] court’s order requiring the bond will be moot,” Visconti said. She added: “We are very pleased that we were able to resolve the issues on appeal with MSK and Mr. Gordon. Now, Mr. Quiros can put these issues behind him and the receiver may proceed with distribution of the settlement proceeds pursuant to his settlement with these defendants.

The SEC launched the legal battle against Quiros in 2016 over what the agency described as a “massive eight-year fraudulent scheme” in which Quiros looted more than $50 million of more than $350 million that had been raised for the ski resort and related projects from hundreds of foreign investors through the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ EB-5 immigrant investor program.

In February 2018, Quiros cut a deal to resolve the SEC’s claims against him, agreeing he was liable for $81 million in disgorgement and agreeing to pay a $1 million civil penalty and forfeit roughly $417,000 in cash. He was also permanently barred from participating in the EB-5 program in any capacity.

The SEC action triggered other litigation over the failed project, including a proposed class action in Vermont from seven Jay Peak investors against MSK and Gordon, who began representing Quiros, his business partner William Stenger and the receivership entities in mid-2013 in connection with the SEC’s investigation. The investors claimed MSK and Gordon breached their fiduciary duties and aided and abetted the alleged fraud.

The receiver revealed the settlement in a June 4 motion. It would resolve the investors’ proposed class action against MSK and Gordon and a separate suit Goldberg filed in Miami against the law firm and Gordon. The receiver’s suit also alleged breach of fiduciary duty as well as fraudulent transfer claims.

Judge Gayles granted final approval of the deal on July 29 following a hearing the same day in which he heard 90 minutes of arguments from Quiros’ attorney, according to the receiver’s motion.

Goldberg is represented by Jeffrey C. Schneider of Levine Kellogg Lehman Schneider & Grossman LLP.

The proposed class plaintiffs are represented by Harley S. Tropin and Tal J. Lifshitz of Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton LLP.

MSK is represented by David R. Atkinson and Stephen C. Richman of Gunster Yoakley & Stewart PA.

The SEC is represented in-house by Christopher E. Martin and Robert Kent Levenson.

Quiros is represented by Melanie E. Damian and Melissa D. Visconti of Damian & Valori LLP.

The case is SEC v. Quiros et al., case number 1:16-cv-21301, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The receiver’s case is Michael I. Goldberg, as Receiver for Jay Peak Inc. et al. v. Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP et al., case number 1:19-cv-21862, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The proposed class action is Qureshi et al. v.

People’s United Financial Inc. et al., case number 2:18-cv-00163, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont.

–Editing by Robert Rudinger.

Click here to read the original pdf.

Click here to read the original article.

The Dotted Line: How to Navigate Vaccine Mandates

By Joe Bousquin

August 31, 2021

This feature is a part of “The Dotted Line” series, which takes an in-depth look at the complex legal landscape of the construction industry.

With construction workers exhibiting some of the highest vaccine hesitancy rates of any occupation, contractors are increasingly finding themselves being pulled between the personal preferences of their employees in a tight labor market and owner requirements that all workers on their jobsites be inoculated against COVID-19.

Click here to read the original pdf.

Click here to read the original article.

Helms-Burton Lawsuits Remain in Gridlock as Window to Litigate Closes for Some

By Dan Roe

August 27, 2021

Despite the uphill battle for plaintiffs, U.S.-Cuba trade expert John Kavulich estimates that 85% of the estimated $19 million in law firm revenue generated by the litigation has come from defendant firms as Big Law stepped up to represent the companies accused of “trafficking” in property rightfully owned by Cuban-Americans.

Click here to read the original article.

Judge, Litigators Say Demanding Change of Cuba’s Communist Government is Personal

By Michael A. Mora 

August 20, 2021

The U.S. Homeland Security secretary announced new sanctions—the freezing of assets and a U.S. travel ban—on Cuban government officials during his visit to Miami on Thursday.

And some South Florida litigators—like A. Dax Bello, the Cuban American Bar Association president and partner at Stewart Tilghman Fox Bianchi & Cain in Miami—said they fear recent sanctions have “no teeth,” and that the U.S. needs to do more.

For instance, some requests widely sought since the last round of sanctions on communist officials are still being ignored, like providing Cubans with access to the internet, they said.

Click here to read the original article.

Click here to read the full PDF.

Logo for Daily Business Review

For Cuban-American Legal Community, Supporting Regime Change Is a ‘Marathon’

By Dan Roe

August 16, 2021


Miami is full of talented Cuban-American lawyers, but none can enter a Cuban courtroom to represent political prisoners. Here’s what they’re doing instead.

Click here to read the original article.

On Bitcoin and Ponzi Schemes

By Tal J. Lifshitz  

July/August, 2021

Bernie Madoff died in federal prison a few months ago with the dubious distinction of being the mastermind of the largest and most infamous Ponzi scheme of all time. Madoff stole tens of billions of dollars from thousands of investors over the course of 17 years. He received a 150-year prison sentence for his crimes and was ordered to forfeit $170 billion in assets. Madoff’s scheme collapsed in 2008, but the recovery and distribution of assets pursuant to the unwinding of the scheme, and the inevitable litigation accompanying that process, continue today.

Satoshi Nakamoto’s legacy remains to be determined. Most know him as the man behind the curtain—the anonymous founder of Bitcoin, the cryptocurrency that has gone from a cypherpunk electronic cash experiment to a digital asset, which, at its all-time high, has already surpassed a $1 trillion
market cap.

Click here to read the full publication.

Click here to read the full article.

Click here to read the full PDF.