SocGen Owes $792M Over Castro-Seized Bank, Heirs Say

/in /by

July 10,2019
By Michael Watanabe

Heirs of a bank that was seized by Fidel Castro’s government in 1960 — and then used as Cuba’s national bank — claimed in Florida federal court Wednesday that Société Générale SA ignored U.S. embargoes, profiting by doing business with the bank, and should pay back $792 million in damages.

Don Carlos Nuñez y Doña Pura Galves Inc. — which is made up of the inheritors of Banco Nuñez, whose founders fled Cuba in the 1960s after Castro’s takeover — claims that SocGen violated the Helms-Burton Act by unlawfully trafficking its seized property when it did business with Banco Nacional de Cuba, the government-owned successor to their ancestors’ bank.

“In or around 2000, SocGen created a system of ‘credit facilities’ to enable BNC to circumvent the United States’ economic embargo of Cuba,” the bank heirs claim. “SocGen’s system involved concealing and processing BNC’s transactions with foreign corporations, and in exchange for this service, SocGen received over $1 billion in profit.”

The heirs’ suit follows a November announcement of settlements with U.S. federal and state authorities in which SocGen agreed to pay $1.34 billion in fines to resolve investigations into its processing of transactions involving Cuba, Iran and other targets of U.S. sanctions.

Founded in 1921, Banco Nuñez was the second largest Cuban-owned bank on the island, with a $7.8 million equity, by the time the Castro regime took over, according to the complaint.

In 1960, the Castro government ousted foreign and national bank owners, nationalizing all the island’s banks, the complaint alleges. All of these banks were absorbed into BNC, the suit claims.

In 1961, Banco Nuñez’s founders fled the country to “escape the extrajudicial killings, unjustified imprisonment, and cruelty that would come to embody Fidel Castro’s reign,” the complaint alleges.

Despite the passage of the Helms-Burton Act — which took effect in 1996 and extended an embargo to stop foreign companies from trading in the confiscated property of U.S. citizens — SocGen did deals with BNC, profiting at least $1.34 billion.

The bank heirs claim that they own a 10.5% stake in the Cuban national bank because that’s how much of BNC was made up of Banco Nuñez’s properties at the time of the consolidation.

SocGen should fork over about $792 million, the heirs’ attorney, Javier Asis Lopez of Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton PA, told Law360 in an email. This calculation, though not laid out in the complaint, is made up of the $7.8 million equity at the time of the seizure, plus a 6% annual interest, and then tripled by a provision in the Helms-Burton Act, Lopez confirmed.

Counsel for SocGen did not immediately respond to request for comment Wednesday.

The heirs are represented by Javier Asis Lopez, Stephanie M. Gomez and Evan

  1. Stroman of Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton PA.

Counsel for SocGen was not immediately known Wednesday.

The case is Sucesores de Don Carlos Nunez y Dona Pura Galves, Inc. d/b/a Banco Nuñez v. Societe Generale, S.A., d/b/a Societe Generale Americas, case number 1:19-cv-22842, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Click here to read the full article.

Societe Generale sued for $792 million by heirs of Cuban bank seized by Castro

/in /by

July 10, 2019
By Jonathan Stempel

The family of the former owners of a Cuban bank seized by Fidel Castro’s government nearly six decades ago sued Societe Generale (SOGN.PA) for approximately $792 million, saying the French bank owes damages for circumventing U.S. sanctions against Cuba.

In a complaint filed on Wednesday with the U.S. District Court in Miami, 14 grandchildren of Carlos and Pura Nuñez, who once owned Banco Nuñez, want to hold Societe Generale liable under U.S. law for doing business with Cuba’s central bank, which nationalized Banco Nuñez and other lenders in 1960.

A lawyer for the plaintiffs said he believed the case was the first against a bank that allegedly “trafficked” in property expropriated by the Castro regime, since the Trump administration said in April it would begin letting U.S. nationals sue companies for such conduct.

“Victims of the Cuban regime who had their property confiscated now have a vehicle to get justice,” Javier Lopez, the lawyer, said in an interview. “We have multiple financial institutions that we’re looking to target.”

Societe Generale did not immediately respond to requests for comment after market hours.

The lawsuit was filed eight months after Societe Generale agreed to pay $1.34 billion and enter a deferred prosecution agreement to settle U.S. and New York regulatory charges that it handled billions of dollars of transactions related to Cuba and other countries under U.S. sanctions.

According to the plaintiffs, Societe Generale generated hundreds of millions of dollars of fees by lending money to and processing transactions for Banco Nacional de Cuba from 2000 to 2010.

The plaintiffs said they own a claim to 10.5% of the equity in Banco Nacional de Cuba, roughly the percentage that Banco Nuñez represented when it was seized.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs at Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton based the $792 million damages estimate on Banco Nuñez’s $7.8 million worth at the time, plus 6% annual interest and triple damages under the Helms-Burton Act, a 1996 federal law.

The right to sue under that law had been suspended for 23 years because of opposition from the international community and concern that U.S. courts could be overrun by lawsuits.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced the lifting of that suspension in April, to boost pressure on Havana to end Cuban support for Venezuela’s socialist president, Nicolas Maduro.

The case is Sucesors de Don Carlos Nuñez y Doña Pura Galvez Inc v Societe Generale SA, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, No. 19-22842.

Click here for the original article.

Richard Lightsey and Jessica Cook

/in /by

David Rosendorf represents South Carolina utility customers who had filed a proposed class action in connection with an abandoned nuclear reactor project in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of Westinghouse Electric Company, LLC, which was contracted to complete the project.  This case deals with the intersection of class action and bankruptcy law.

 

Barry Mukamal, as Bankruptcy Panel Trustee

/in /by

Barry Mukamal is a panel trustee for the Southern District of Florida.  He was appointed as the Chapter 11 Trustee of American Resource Management Group, LLC/Resort Release, a group of timeshare exit companies.  The Chapter 11 case was filed with pending litigation between timeshare exit companies and the timeshare developers.  Corali Lopez-Castro and David Samole lead the Trustee representation to oversee the comprehensive transition of operations, handle pending litigation, pursue recovery of assets, and address the timeshare exit customers.

South Florida timeshare exit firms file Chapter 11 amid lawsuits 

City of Coral Gables 2018

/in /by

Cori Lopez-Castro represents the City of Coral Gables in many of its high-profile matters, including representing the City in defending its ordinance banning polystyrene. Ms. Lopez-Castro successfully obtained a final judgment in favor of the City entered by the Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County. The final judgment declares three Florida Statutes unconstitutional. The final judgment also determines that the City’s ordinances related to polystyrene regulation are valid and enforceable. The plaintiffs have appealed the final judgment.  The City is still waiting for an appellate ruling.  Ms. Lopez-Castro is also representing the City in its dispute with its utility provider, Florida Power & Light.  She was successful having the state court retain jurisdiction of the dispute.  Most courts abstain from considering the issues.  The matter against FP&L was settled after the Order on the Motion to Dismiss was issued.

Coral Gables can’t make FPL prepare for next storm, but can sue for Irma response delays

Melanie Damian, as Receiver of Onix Capital, LLC

/in /by

Cori Lopez Castro and David Rosendorf represent Melanie Damian, as Receiver for Onix Capital, LLC (Onix) and a number of Relief Defendants (“Receivership Entities”). The SEC  initiated this action against the Receivership Entities alleging that Onix and others violated the anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws by fraudulently raising millions of dollars from investors based on material misrepresentations. David and Cori have represented the Receiver in her efforts to (a) investigate and bring claims the Receivership Entities have against third parties; (b) negotiate and implement resolution of competing claims arising from a parallel Chilean insolvency proceeding; (c) implement a distribution plan that was ultimately approved by the district court; and (d) liquidate receivership assets for the benefit of investors who were defrauded by Onix.

MCM Bodily Injury victims

/in /by

Cori Lopez-Castro and David Rosendorf represent the individuals who were injured or are the personal representatives or family members of individuals injured or killed (collectively, the Plaintiffs) as a result of the collapse of the pedestrian bridge which had been constructed to link the Florida International University campus to the City of Sweetwater (FIU Bridge).  Magnum Construction Management, LLC f/k/a Munilla Construction Management, LLC (MCM) was the contractor on the FIU Bridge.  There are presently twenty lawsuits against MCM and others filed in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court seeking damages from MCM and others as a result of the collapse of the FIU Bridge. Cori and David are representing the collective interests of the Plaintiffs in MCM’s bankruptcy case, including obtaining insurance proceeds from applicable carriers and assisting with the implementation of procedures for allocating the proceeds from MCM’s insurance policies among the Plaintiffs.

MCM files Chapter 11 in aftermath of FIU bridge collapse

Construction firm reaches $42M settlement for FIU bridge collapse

Group of 184 Pension Claimants (Archdiocese of San Juan)

/in /by

David Samole currently represents a group of 184 pension claimants in the multi-million dollar Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings of the Archdiocese of San Juan as part of the Catholic Church of Puerto Rico.  He represented the pension claimants in all aspects of the Chapter 11 and related proceedings, and helped secure dismissal of the Chapter 11 proceeding now on appeal including related issues pending review before the United States Supreme Court. David has preserved and improved the pension claimants’ recovery position by representing them in Bankruptcy Court, in various levels of pending appeals and in the boardroom.

FourShore Capital, LLC

/in /by

David L. Rosendorf represents FourShore Capital, LLC in connection with the potential acquisition of several Florida trucking companies which are about to file Chapter 11 petitions.  He has led the strategy as to how to structure the transaction, including purchasing secured debt, and thereafter, buying the assets as part of a §363 sale.

Beach Haus Bal Harbour, LLC

/in /by

Corali Lopez-Castro and David L. Rosendorf represent the purchaser of property in Bal Harbour, Florida. A receiver appointed in State Court placed the Seller into a Chapter 11 bankruptcy and filed a fraudulent transfer action against the firm’s client, Beach Haus Bal Harbour, LLC., seeking to set aside the transfer of the property.  The case has been very litigious and involved the valuation of unique real estate assets.